|
Post by mitchfit on May 1, 2024 22:57:26 GMT
too agree with archtopeddy about Hendrix having great songwriting skills. below a tune about our possible future when the air gets to funky to breath anymore. classify as prophetic science fiction: it would take my poor typing hours for this. please see: www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/jimihendrix/1983amermanishouldturntobe.html mitchfit PS made a posting here about same lyrics, including original hand written beginning of song from his daughter. can't find it. long story made short--i think where: Forever Forever is written got changed to "for air, for air" many moons later when final recording was done. YMMV.
|
|
|
Post by mitchfit on May 1, 2024 22:36:51 GMT
go away one day and this thread has tripled in size-whew.
re: tomgiemza's "Murder Most Foul" posting. below see different ways of getting the same the point across.
here in the US, the federal government ordered the federal government to release ALL documents about same in back in 2021.
at the rate allowed to "protect intelligence gathering sources/methods" with redacting/censoring where/how info became known from 60 years ago, the process could take up to 20 years to complete...
Traffic--
CSN--
below from back in the 1970's. i wrote it but the message NEVER made any music in my soul. anyone who wants to pick the ball up and run with it-do so with my blessings. i haven't for a half century...
THE BROTHERS K
the best planned accidental event it happened just the other day in his lincoln just like Lincoln the last act of that play across the stage the curtain went 'till the jester did an encore in L.A.
and the brass on the hill in the grass lies there still
at the scene of the accident morality-the only witness hid in the array of the crowd all drawn there by death's scent and wonders how it ever got this way
the spent casing kinda rare on the ground was left there
"sir hand" a pawn-a pawn is thus sent from the wizard of "oz walled" in to hide control from day as these words don't say what they meant they really mean nothing 'cause the cast got away
and the case went unseen can you face what i mean?
mitchfit
PS- bonzo if you read this--sent you a PM with destructions for loading videos.
|
|
|
Post by mitchfit on May 1, 2024 0:07:23 GMT
OUCH! sure glad she wrote "Back To Me" for the unfortunate guy in the video.
another song that could be taken the wrong way entirely below. makes me wonder how nobody ended up getting arrested for stalking:
mitchfit
|
|
|
Post by mitchfit on Apr 30, 2024 0:46:50 GMT
^^^^ very true, it doesn't have to be poetry. but some of it is. one of the great songwriters of our times below, IMO.
read an interview way, way back in the day where he said he would [most often] play the song accompaniment on his guit and then start humming the notes for the lyrics. then would start adding oohs and aahs and various consonant sounds to narrow down the word line into word "sounds" that went with/conveyed his idea of what the feel of the tune should be.
[IE: think "cut him till he cried out" in "The Boxer"]
then it would all get boiled down into the finished lyrical words afterward. i'm guessing most people use the reverse order-starting with the words first then building around them like richclough suggested in his post.
i don't think there are any SET guidelines, the end product will show if order matters or not.
IT SURE WORKED FOR HIM!!!
mitchfit
|
|
|
Post by mitchfit on Apr 22, 2024 5:39:18 GMT
musicnerdshq.com/famous-blind-musicians/but the one who went beyond my wildest imaginations was Ludwig van Beethoven. it is said he kept on composing symphony music after becoming totally deaf. mitchfit
|
|
|
Post by mitchfit on Apr 21, 2024 20:26:09 GMT
mitchfit
|
|
|
Post by mitchfit on Apr 21, 2024 1:28:34 GMT
thanks for posting Jerron "Blind Boy" Paxton video. shamed that i had never heard of him until now. am guessing that will quickly change...
mitchfit
|
|
|
Post by mitchfit on Apr 20, 2024 22:57:07 GMT
richclough,
hence the precise definition being ARTIFICIAL intelligence. can't see any demand for same as anything more than an ARTIFICIALLY created demand.
economics rule #1, supply and demand ultimately determine cost.
to insure i don't offend anyone around the world by singling out their government--- we ALL have ARTIFICIAL intelligence running our nations. electronic and organic.
where is the demand?
$0.02, mitchfit
|
|
|
Post by mitchfit on Apr 20, 2024 18:23:50 GMT
PD^^^^
dunno. my crystal ball hasn't been been cleaned for a long time now and is now covered in a thick layer of smoke residue. could only review the past in hopes a semiconscious extrapolation into the future MIGHT be valid.
the san fransicko music scene was in large part the handy work of Bill Graham. he rented old venues that were no longer profitable in the Haight-Ashbury district and turned them into rock concert venues to harvest the lost potential of abundant outdoor free concerts of that bygone error. eventually the underground capitalists would roam about after dark and break into cars concert goers had invaded/overwhelmed the immediate area with. bud-o-mine got to the point that he would leave his Volk's Wagen "bug" doors unlocked only to learn the perps had no time to waste trying door handles before breaking the windows to get in. doubt the locals were very happy with the weekend parking gridlock either.
feel that this and profit$ eventually drove Graham to pretty much pioneer the arena rock scene by plugging into same equation unscheduled sports stadium time where profit loss "old venues" were mentioned above.
still, the abstract scienterrific message of live music energy exchange hinted at in previous postings was a big part of the audience attraction, IMO. after hearing the very real dangers of large scale sports arenas stampedes, like yourself my concert love waned and led to an ultimate break up of the relationship. also learned the shortcomings of mass parking issues. nowadaze, the "average" cost of ONE beer @ NFL league (what we call football here) games is $10 dollars. if that made you flinch, eat a BIG meal before attending one...
methinx these problems were what eventually created the demand for MTV that Knopfler* wrote about in 1985 with "Money for Nothing". nearly thirty years downstream we have an entire generation of populace who may have never gone to a live music show. they may never witness the energy that a live show has to offer.
they may also never know how cold and sterile AI generated "musak" is compared to humanly created songs.
the tide MIGHT reverse in the equal-but-opposite-reaction that Isaac Newton defined if a good live performance is seen by them. or not.
no Nostradamus, mitchfit
*Knopfler-- think his new album, "One Deep River" is a counter reaction to all of the label, agents and promotional parasite %es that are feeding on the industry today. a successful parasite doesn't kill the host. if nothing else, listen to first song and >>>TRY<<< to tell me he isn't a JJ Cale fan.
|
|
|
Post by mitchfit on Apr 18, 2024 22:22:09 GMT
not by him, but about him
maybe they will get to jam again.
RIP, mitchfit
|
|
|
Post by mitchfit on Apr 18, 2024 17:31:08 GMT
have to paraphrase MM here. recall him saying in a posting from yesteryear that he felt changes in scale are easier to overcome than changes in nut width. holds true for itself also.
mitchfit
|
|
|
Post by mitchfit on Apr 18, 2024 17:18:47 GMT
PD,
through a thick fog of cryptic ambiguity an image begins to form.
now i'm even jealouser.
bonzo,
pheromones were around a long, long time before phentanyl. some say same can be more addictive, and down the course of time--even more expen$ive.
:^)
color me enlightened, even though my favorite color is camouflage.
mitchfit
|
|
|
Post by mitchfit on Apr 18, 2024 6:50:45 GMT
You're correct of course mitchfit. But we know Jimi did a lot of clubbing when he first came to London and became influenced by the British music scene...... and i am jealous as hell i couldn't have heard those same gigs that he did! mitchfit
|
|
|
Post by mitchfit on Apr 18, 2024 6:12:39 GMT
while not endorsing any of the conclusions of the dual slit experiment video i posted before, i uploaded it to stress the point that a person observing it could change the out come. applying same to Eddy's statement. animals react to music. plants react to music. we can't communicate with either with no language in common, yet music can. i look forward to the time when Kirilian Photography becomes able to capture the 30-ish frames per second rate of early video cameras. personally believe a music concert Kirilian video would be somewhat like an energy tsunami. YMMV: duckduckgo.com/?q=kirilian+photography&t=ffab&iax=images&ia=imagesSO WHY DID HE CHOOSE TO POST THE DUAL SLIT LIGHT EXPERIMENT? BELOW FROM: www.britannica.com/video/186826/test-paradox-Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Nicolas-Gisin-University-of "GISIN: Going to telecom fibers gives us the possibility to go over long distances because these fibers are very well-tuned for that. One village is north, is near Lake Geneva. And it is about five kilometers north and the other one is about five kilometers south. And so we have this ten kilometer, direct, special separation. So if then, on the north of Geneva, let's say on one side, we do a measurement. Then the photon on that side acquires a property. And instantaneously, in theory, and certainly faster than light in practice, the other one there also gets the opposite property. The output on one side is random, completely random. The outcome on the other side is also completely random. However, the two outcomes are always opposite. Not only do we not know which photon has which property, but according to the theory, well confirmed by the experiment, the photons themselves don't know." an experiment we all can do at home. take a digital volt/ohm meter. switch it to direct current measurement. grab the positive lead with your hand and ground the other. then switch from positive to negative in hand and ground the other. why does the energy flow both ways? mitchfit
|
|
|
Post by mitchfit on Apr 17, 2024 3:03:34 GMT
archtopeddy said, "When humans play, we play and interact with not only the other players, but with the listeners who are hearing us. ALL of us are part of the musical experience." did you ever hear about the double slit experiment? through many recreations of this since the late 1800s, it seems to imply that a human observer may contaminate the experiment. see: the observer effect in human behavior paragraph in posted link below: www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-human-behavior-inspired-double-slit-experiment-outcome-kumar-jenhci don't even pretend to be able to explain this, mitchfit
|
|