|
Post by catsmiler on Dec 4, 2020 14:58:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by pascal on Dec 5, 2020 15:09:44 GMT
The serial number is wrong on the Elderly details, "Acanthus" is #0260 on Mark's book not 0261 (a #1) Nice piece of National history though. My regret are the NRP tuners (not very good, have these on my squareneck) they could at least change them for Waverly...
|
|
|
Post by hh1978 on Feb 1, 2021 22:03:28 GMT
On Mark Makin's book, #0261 is a squareneck, so it can't be the same guitar. Not sure if there's any other known Acanthus roundneck?
|
|
|
Post by Mark Makin on Feb 2, 2021 12:37:29 GMT
I agree with you that this is VERY confusing at the moment. Firstly, I know that 260 (with no zero prefix) is DEFINITELY a square neck acanthus de luxe pattern. It is owned by Colin McCubbin and we have photos. 0260 (roundneck) transferred from Brozman's original database. He recorded it as a "Stock Style 4" which, naively at the time in 1993, we concluded was an early pattern of Style 4. 0261 (roundneck) I have recorded as a Style 1 owned by Mike Lewis. On asking Mike about it, he doesn't recall it at all!!! So for the minute, we're up in the air about it. I think confirmation from Elderly would be a start!
In answer to "how many roundneck acanthus triplates do we have?" - we know of 0122, 0127, 0141, 0162, 0163, 0260(?), and 0269.
While we're on the subject - we know of fewer squarenecks - only 260, 339, 376, 414.
|
|
|
Post by hh1978 on Feb 2, 2021 16:11:43 GMT
My bad, I made two mistakes while checking the tables : I missed the zero prefix, and I missed the whole 1927/34 table and went directly through the S series table, which explains while I didn't see any acanthus roundneck, nor the 0261 style 1.
Sorry if I added confusion to an already confusing matter.
|
|